Android Android Pie Android Smartphones Huawei Huawei Smartphones Kirin 980 Latest qualcomm Samsung Samsung Smartphones Smartphones snapdragon 845 Snapdragon 855 Tech Xiaomi Xiaomi SMartphones

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Benchmark Comparison with Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 980

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Benchmark Comparison with Snapdragon 845 and Kirin 980

Android smartphones, though they differ in design and features, are primarily utilized by either Snapdragon chipsets, Kirin chipsets or Mediatek chipsets. Specifically, Samsung telephones have well-known Snapdragon processors, and in 2018 probably the most needed Android cellular circuits have been Snapdragon 845. Snapdragon 845 was found in virtually all other flagship units. However, Kirin chips, like Kirin 980, introduced their debut within the Huawei flagship Mate 20 Pro. At present we take a look at the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Benchmark comparison with its predecessor, Snapdragon 845 and its competition Kirin 980.

Identical to all major Android units have been powered by Snapdragon 845 in 2018, it is probably that Snapdragon 855 might be found in all the most important releases of 2019, such as the Galaxy S10. Final yr has additionally seen a speedy rise in extremely complicated and graphically intensive video games reminiscent of PUBG and Fortnite. These games serve a wide audience, and the BR style continues to grow on cellular units, as the upcoming COD BR mannequin can also be working. To maintain up with new purposes that require greater processing power, producers depend on high-speed processors as well their units, the two fastest processors at present in the cellular world are Snapdragon 855 and Kirin 980.

The Snapdragon 855 chip was released final yr in the course of the Snapdragon tech summit, but the company did not present any controls or benchmarking. CES 2019. Because of the Xdadeveloper Mishaal Rehman, we now have the first benchmarks for the processor. Before we get to the benchmark factors, let's take a look at the info of all three cellular chip collection in query

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 HiSilicon Kirin 980
CPU 1 Kryo 485 & # 39; Prime & # 39; (ARM Cortex-A76-based), up to 2.84 GHz3 Kryo 485 (ARM Cortex-A76-based), as much as 2.42 GHz

4 Kryo 385 (ARM Cortex-A55-based), as much as 1.8 GHz

45% efficiency enchancment compared to earlier era *

4 Kryo 385 (ARM Cortex-A75-based), up to 2.8 GHz4 Kryo 385 (ARM Cortex-A55-based), as much as 1.8 GHz

25% performance enchancment compared to previous era *

2ARM Cortex-A76, up to 2.60 GHz2 ARM Cortex-A76, as much as 1.92 GHz

four ARM Cortex-A55, up to 1.80 GHz

GPU Adreno 64020% Performance Enchancment over the Previous Era * Adreno 63025% Performance Enhancement In comparison with the Earlier Era * Mali-G76MP10
] 4x 16-bit, 2133MHz LPDDR4X 4x 16-bit, 1866MHz LPDDR4X 4x 16-bit, LPDDR4X-4266
Manufacturing Course of 7nm (TSMC) 10nm (TSMC ) 10nm LPP (Samsung) 7nm (TSMC)

Probably the most demanding issue between Snapdragon 855 and its predecessor Snapdragon 845 is that 855 is predicated on a more moderen 7nm process. Kirin 980 has the same course of as 855. I need to point out that Kirin 980 was the first cellular chip based mostly on the 7nm course of

Benchmark purposes used on this comparison

  • AnTuTu: This can be a comprehensive benchmark. AnTuTu checks the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory, however consists of each abstract exams and late consumer experience simulations (for example, a subtest related with ListView shopping). The ultimate scores are based on the designer's issues
  • GeekBench: CPU-centered check utilizing multiple computational workloads similar to compression, search, rendering, physics and ray monitoring, HDR / blur. There are additionally some latency and bandwidth reminiscences. The breakdown of the factors provides you some metrics. The final scores are in line with the designer's issues
  • GFXBench: The aim is to simulate the rendering of online game graphics using the newest APIs. Numerous display results and top quality designs. Newer checks use Vulkan, while the previous exams use OpenGL ES 3.1. Meters are frames in the course of the check and frames per second (the second quantity is divided by the length of the check, primarily), each of which are particular and not some weighted factors, which is absolutely helpful. language features and performance in several features; Javascript Math, Encryption, and Search Power
  • 3DMark: An intense graphics parameter with tons of effects and physics designed to spotlight numerous body boundaries. The ultimate scores are in accordance with the designer's remarks (ie No FPS, and so forth.)
  • AImark (Ludashi) / AI BenchMark: Check numerous artificial neural network (ANN) implementations. Key options embrace point products and matrix multiplication and nonlinearity features. Paralleling is vital and these benchmarks use DSP (especially Hexagon Vector eXtensions [HVX] but not Tensor Accelerator.)

Benchmarks

Rivals:

1) Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Reference Gadget

  • Android 9 Pie Qualcomm Custom-made AOSP Software program)
  • 6GB RAM LPDDR4X RAM

2) Google Pixel three XL (Qualcomm Snapdragon 845)

  • Android 9 Pie (Google Pixel OEM Program with January 2019 Security Patch)
  • 4GB LPDDR4X RAM [19659041] Benchmark Snapdragon 855 ” /> Google Pixel three

    3) Honor Magic 2 (HiSilicon Kirin 980)

    • Android 9 Pie (Magic UI 2.0 / EMUI 9.zero OEM Program, December 2018)
    • ]
    • 8GB LPDDR4X RAM

      Comparison of Snapdragon 855 Benchmarks Honor Magic 2

    Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Benchmark Outcomes

    Comparison Version [19659047] Version Model Version 1 Trial 2 Tr ial 3 Common Comparison Outcomes *** AnTuTu 7,1,1 * 360,346 360,409 336,467 352,407,three 352,407,3 352,407,3 GeekBench (single core) 4,3,zero * three,532 3,532 three.525 three.525.three 3500-300 GeekBench (Multi-core) four.three.zero * 11193 11152 11251 11251 11,198.7 11,000-12,000 PCMark 2.0.3710 * 8907 8957 8832 eight,898.7 9,000 GFxBench ES3.1 1080 Manhattan Offscreen four.zero * 71 (four,408 frames) 71 (four,401 frames) 71 (four,396 frames) 71 (1996) 71 GFxBench ES3.1 1080 Automotive Chase Offscreen four.0 * 42 (2496 frames) 42 (2495 frames) [1965901] 5] 42 (2 487 photographs) 42 42 42 42 19659060] GFxBench ES3.0 1080 Manhattan Offscreen four.zero * 102 (6,321 frames) [19659015] 100 (6,207 frames) 102 (6,326 frames) 101.three 100-102 GFxBench ES2.0 1080 T-Rex Offscreen 4.0 * 167 (9,353 photographs) 167 (9,372 pictures) 167 (9,353 photographs) 167 167-168